The research lens on a retail-academy website rebuild
The archive before the redesign
Nothing is invented.

01Nothing is invented — The rule that decided what the first deliverable would be, before any design existed.Full size ↗ 
02The shape of the engagement — Relationship to the work, and the dates version control can actually support.Full size ↗ 
03The first deliverable was an archive — Why a rebuild starts with a transcription of the thing being replaced.Full size ↗ 
04Four rules, set before the work began — Each one removes a specific way a rebuild lies about its subject.Full size ↗ 
05Fourteen places the source disagreed with itself — Every one needed a decision, a default, and a reason written down.Full size ↗ 
06When the only honest answer is an inference — Two listings published a salary with no period. The reasoning is kept next to the result.Full size ↗ 
07Thirty gaps, numbered and owned — What the research could not find becomes a register, not a silence.Full size ↗ 
08Twelve recorded, four published — The archive captured what students said about. It did not capture what they said.Full size ↗ 
09The retouching line, and the test that drew it — A generative pass was tried on two photographs. It returned people who were not the same people.Full size ↗ 
10Translation as a research problem — 1,664 of 1,664 strings, and the 42 that stay English on purpose.Full size ↗ 
11Where the archive itself was wrong — The research corrected its own record twice. That is the part most write-ups delete.Full size ↗ 
12Two things nobody asked the research to find — A transcription pass over a whole site turns up what an audit was never scoped for.Full size ↗ 
13What this artifact does not establish — The stated-limits section. Every artifact in this set ends with one.Full size ↗